Erotica author, aka Elspeth Potter, on Writing from the Inside
Thursday, April 15, 2010
The Long and the Short of It
How do we decide a length for our stories?
I think a lot of it has to do with the stories themselves.
A friend of mine used to say that novels didn't adapt as well into feature films as short stories did, because a feature film was essentially a short story, about the Most Important Event in a person's life. If you adapt a whole novel into a feature film, you must perforce skip a lot, because novels are, in general, about the Most Important Time in a person's life. (Yes, those statements are full of generalizations, but they're still useful, I think.)
I brought up the feature film issue because to me, that explanation also tells us something about the sorts of stories that work better as shorts and those that work better as longs. Sure, some novels focus on one event, and some novels take place in very compressed time frames, but most of them follow the characters for a little while. I sometimes envision it this way: the novel as a piece of string and the short story as a little round thing in the palm of your hand. (I never said I envisioned it in a clever way....)
So I think it's important to know what your story is before you decide its length. Sometimes, one finds out what sort of story it is while writing it, and wastes a lot of time either trying to turn a short story idea into a novel, or to cram a novel idea into a short story.
Related Post:
Romance in Short.
I think a lot of it has to do with the stories themselves.
A friend of mine used to say that novels didn't adapt as well into feature films as short stories did, because a feature film was essentially a short story, about the Most Important Event in a person's life. If you adapt a whole novel into a feature film, you must perforce skip a lot, because novels are, in general, about the Most Important Time in a person's life. (Yes, those statements are full of generalizations, but they're still useful, I think.)
I brought up the feature film issue because to me, that explanation also tells us something about the sorts of stories that work better as shorts and those that work better as longs. Sure, some novels focus on one event, and some novels take place in very compressed time frames, but most of them follow the characters for a little while. I sometimes envision it this way: the novel as a piece of string and the short story as a little round thing in the palm of your hand. (I never said I envisioned it in a clever way....)
So I think it's important to know what your story is before you decide its length. Sometimes, one finds out what sort of story it is while writing it, and wastes a lot of time either trying to turn a short story idea into a novel, or to cram a novel idea into a short story.
Related Post:
Romance in Short.
Tags:
short fiction,
writing,
writing craft
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great point! I've seen too many movies that would have been more enjoyable [and less of a waste of writing time ;) ] if they'd been contstrained to thirty minutes. Now, if only I could figure out what I'm writing before the characters take over. Sigh...
ReplyDeleteMy stories love to fool me into thinking they're a novella, then they get me hooked. Oh, bad news, writer, we want to be over a 100,000 words and, guess what, this is actually a trilogy series.
ReplyDeleteThat's what happened with Murder by Hair Spray.
Darla, I've seen some movies like that....
ReplyDeleteSavanna, what happens if you decide it's a trilogy? Can you get a novella then? *heh*
Victoria, nope. The scope of the story is a trilogy of about 100,000 words each ~ the first book is epubbed and in print. There's lots of world building, since it's a futuristic and they also travel to the hero's homeworld. And the various plots are complex. Lots of secondary characters, too.
ReplyDeleteHmmm, not much with the novella-length, then!
ReplyDelete